BACK TO HOME

ã 1999, by P. Wells

Men and Women Are Not Alike

Women work outside the home to pay for an extra car to go to work, and for extra clothes, fast food, and beauty aids that they need because they work. Then they must buy appliances so that they don’t have to work as hard, and spend money they earn on diets, spas, and health clubs, because they work, but do not get exercise doing housework.

They pay for counselors to save their failing marriages and delinquent children, because they must put their work first. Finally, they pay taxes on their earnings to the government which decides to spend part of those taxes to care for their motherless kids in crowded nurseries, and later, on rehab centers and/or prisons for the same kids.

Meanwhile, back in the halls of Congress, politicians vote on measures that will increase the female work force. Because the additional taxes can be used to promote their own pet projects, line their own pockets, and maintain their stay in office, while supporting coattail bureaucrats to do the jobs that women do much better and for much less money, if they just stayed home and did them.

The average man works from four to six months to earn enough money to pay his taxes. His working wife probably does not earn as much as he pays in extra taxes.

We could afford to pay women to stay home to save on taxes! No one fights harder for a woman’s rights to work than politicians who want women to believe that they must work. Women used to be superior and luckier. They also knew how to control the weaker sex, because of his weakness. "Eve" is still falling for Satan’s lies. We really blew it!

When given a choice, most women will decide to take any course except Economics 101. That may be the reason that few women today understand or apparently have never even heard of the Law of Supply and Demand. On the other hand, very few men who have heard of that law doubt its validity.

My dad insisted that I take Economics 101, and the professor that I had presented the law as if there were absolutely no exceptions to the rule. No male in the class of almost all males questioned the professor’s adamant assertion. That fact is enough to give any woman something to think about.

The Law of Supply and Demand in my words goes something like this: The harder it is to obtain what one wants (especially if it is one of a kind), the bigger the price anyone is willing to pay for it. Or the greater the "demand" is for that particular item or service. The law states, "The greater the supply, the less demand; The less the supply, the greater the demand." Water and air are free--not because it is not necessary--but because it is in great supply. On the other hand, that ugly vase, or pitiful painting, or crummy veil that belong to Jackie Onassis, will sell for thousands of dollars, because each is one of a kind--rare. When men want the price to go up, they invent ways to shrink the supply.

Now, ladies, let us apply that law, which no man questions, to sex. The family would never have been placed in jeopardy, if more women had elected to take

Economics 101, and understood what men value and consider cheap. Women would decide to remain virgins until after the wedding, because men value virginity enough to pay the price--a ring, a marriage license, and "until death do us part." Each virgin is definitely "one of a kind," and well worth the price to men, according to that immutable law.

Be a homemaker, and stay home to be free.

Your spouse will be grateful, and you’ll save your family.

The reason why God created one man and one woman to be joined in one union was to begin propagating children, because the family unit is ideal for that purpose. Marriage is not primarily for the purpose of legalizing sex, but it is primarily to ensure the ideal conditions for nurturing the fruit of any sexual relation, one’s kids.

Marriage has been strongly advocated among those who have sexual relations even though the possibility of having children is out of the question, because such commitments tend to stabilize the family units and keep confusion to a minimum. But marriage would not be necessary at all if no children were involved.

See Mark 12: 25, "For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven." In heaven there is no sex, no children, no death, and no reason to continue propagating the human race. Therefore, no one needs to marry. The irony is that all seem to have lost sight of why we marry in the first place!

The most solid proof that men and women are equal is the use of the same words or terms to apply to us all--even if that term is "man" or "mankind.’ As a serious writer and a member of the sex which is considerably wiser than anyone who is often blinded by his lust, I refuse to be intimidated into the use of the inexpedient "he/she" or "him/her" just to appease the whims of a few FEMALE SEXIST PRIGS.

Incidentally, God, according to Jesus Christ, is neither male nor female. Again, the use of the term, "he," is a matter of expediency. It would not have been fitting for the Lord God Jehovah to come into the world as a freak of nature, a hermaphrodite, just to satisfy the whims of a few foolish females.

Is it possible that the epidemic increase in rape (in addition to being a reaction to violence perpetrated against the rapist) could be a reaction to the fact that men no longer experience the excitement of "The Chase"? Women have become so willing to jump into bed--even aggressive-- that the only way men can satisfy their deep-seated need to be the hunter and "earn what they get" is to commit rape. Men like a challenge!

If they had to earn sexual pleasure by committing their lives in marriage, they would enjoy a new self-esteem and find contentment that few men in this generation can imagine--much less have experienced.

I believe that men are too weak to deny themselves, but secretly yearn for women to exercise their "no" power instead of their namby-pamby "I’m-yours-for-the-asking, Yes." No greater contempt is ever expressed by mankind than that one hears in men’s locker rooms, ridiculing "easy women," who willingly permit themselves to be used, abused, labeled, and accused as an excuse for denying their guilt. Psychologists call it projection. I call it, "Women are fools!"

Society cannot condition men or women to change their basic natures and their basic instincts. Men lie to get a woman to say, "Yes," and pray to get her to say, "No!"

The average American pays over half of his income (six months wages) in taxes (sales tax and real estate tax) and licenses to marry, to hunt, to fish, to drive a vehicle, to own a dog, or to marry. And they pay hidden taxes for alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, fuels to run vehicles and machinery, and real estate taxes as part of the rent he pays, if he doesn’t own any property.

Because so much of a man’s income is spent for the "common good," he is forced to borrow heavily just to provide for housing, utilities, food, and clothing for himself and his family. Since the cost for borrowing at usurious rates takes another big bite out of his income, he soon becomes aware just how much he is in bondage to the system--worse than being a slave.

If he goes on strike to get an increase in wages, his union dues go up to take up the slack. So, he loses the raise, and the pay he did not get while on strike. Anyone can state the problem, of course, but does anyone have the solution?

First, we must state the corollary to all of the above. Women feel they are forced to go into the workplace against their innermost instincts, and leave their children in the hands of incompetent hirelings, making the enslavement of the entire population complete.

The result of having mothers of small children forced into the workplace is the rapid increase in drug abuse and serious crimes committed by children. Also, unprotected children at home alone are being scarred for life because of physical and sexual abuse. The solution to any problem is inherent in the problem itself, and can almost resolve itself if it is stated well. Read on.

Consider how the government spends the money that they collect from the average family, whom they are "devouring"--six months of each human life every year.

That is not an exaggerated statement. For one, there is power in education, they claim, but what are kids taught?

Are they being taught, or are they being brainwashed into accepting the system? Can they read, write, solve mathematical problems, type, use a computer, apply for a job, make a complaint against being robbed? Obviously not, because they are being robbed! Do they know the difference between liberty and license?

Are they encouraged to question the authors of textbooks or are they brainwashed into believing that anyone who writes a book is an authority? Are they being subtly influenced into believing that the government can take care of them better than they can take care of themselves? Are they learning to be independent, or are they being conditioned to be dependent on the government for medical care, nursing home care, and day care for children, when they are too old, or too young, or too sick to take care of themselves?

They are taught that they cannot exist without consulting attorneys, psychologists, humanistic reformers, counselors, psychics, witches, and exercise or diet gurus. Also, that they must engage in rituals that will allegedly help them to cope and adjust to the complex problems of society that society created in the first place? Underlying this dependence on crackpots is the hidden agenda of "New Age" philosophers.

As a child, I did not know anyone who was hospitalized, consulted an attorney, or called the police (the only law enforcement officer was twelve miles away). The fact is that our town hadn’t had a crime reported in forty years. (Newman, IL, pop 1100)

We had no taverns and three churches. Taxes were virtually zilch, nada, zero, none, nothing, and the only library in town had books donated by affluent local citizens. Andrew Carnegie donated most of the libraries in this country, which the government cannot afford to match. Have I overstated the problem or understated the solution? Try filling in the blanks yourself. Then ask the Lord Jesus Christ to come into your life and set you free.

Why do so many women write from a warmed over man’s point-of- view and then wonder why men don’t understand them. Most women say what they imagine a man wants to hear, when he may just like to know what we really think for a change. It is time we start telling men how we really feel. What is so good about a man’s point-of-view, anyway? We do not think, feel, or behave alike, and we must stop expecting otherwise.

Sex education from a woman’s point-of-view is teaching men how to make a living. That is a very important part of what makes a girl’s heart beat faster and turns her limbs into jelly. Just between us girls, we have a right to say, "No," to knit one, purl two on our erogenous zones to confuse us and cloud our basic instinct to insist on being really turned on by an offer of protection and provision for our life long needs.

We have a right to be made to feel secure and safe, before we agree to satisfy the sex appetites of men. Any woman who insists on her rights, concerning her own body--and "pro-choice" women should be adamant on that point--should not go to bed with a man without having a promise to protect her in writing--like a marriage certificate.

Without a wedding, women can never completely abandon herself to her lover freely in a way that is necessary for sexual fulfillment. Women can never be more than a bedroom actress--a paid mistress--a slut, who feels dirty, used, and bereft of self-worth, if she allows her body to be used without security. Later--if not sooner--a girl becomes bitter, resentful, and totally disillusioned.

A young woman may reason that he will marry her after the fact, but that idea is a gamble that no woman can afford to take. She will never know whether he married her because he loved her, or because his guilt made him feel obligated. No feeling of insecurity exceeds that feeling, and a feeling of security is essential to a woman’s complete enjoyment of a sexual relationship. If a man marries out of guilt, then later--if not sooner--he will become bitter, resentful, and totally disillusioned.

So, if a woman thinks she has to "prove her love," because he insists, then she should think again. The most loving thing that she can do is to protect herself from him and save him from his lust and guilt. It certainly beats trying to live with it--trying to live with a man who may even turn to escape by using drugs, or have violent fits of jealousy, because he cannot trust a woman, who could not be trusted to say "No" to him.

Keep in mind, Ladies, and never waver from this thought: When in heat--which is almost all the time--men will say anything to get you in bed. Hey! They even believe what they promise themselves--when in heat! They say they would lay down their lives--walk through fire--dive off a bridge--jump out of a plane without a parachute--give you the moon--even give up drugs and alcohol--make any and every sacrifice just for little ol’ you, if you will just go to bed with them. Problem: They all regain their sanity in the morning, saying, "Well, I must be off. It’s business as usual. See you around, but don’t call me. I’ll call you." Oh, yeah?

I read once that one man thinks there are three "biggest lies." They are amusing, so I will share the other two. "The check is in the mail," and "I’m from the IRS. I’m here to help you." Well, if those scare you, I’m here to tell you that they do not hold a candle to the damage done to the welfare of women and children that the first "biggest lie" has done.

Women must stop falling for it, if the human race is to survive. We have the right instincts, but we need to be true to ourselves. Men pursue sex, but they adore and worship and take to the altar, the ones that they cannot get any other way. Virginity has always been--and always will be--a priceless commodity in the minds of men. Unfortunately, the only virgins around these days are children. Could that be the reason for the epidemic of child molestation? It is time that women take at least half of the responsibility for the state the world is in. We cannot put all the blame on men.

So get off that self-righteous pedestal, Ladies, and stop blaming men for all your troubles, which did not exist before women started insisting on their sexual freedom and other dangerous "rights." What women gained was the dubious "right" to be a single parent, raise juvenile delinquents, and live in poverty, while working sixteen hours a day, and coming home to more to do at night. You do have "No" power, so use it!

l. A woman has a right to stay home and care for the children that she bears for men.

She may choose to do the work of a man, choose not to marry, and choose not to bear children, but she has the inalienable right to be a full-time wife and mother.

2. Women have a right to provision and protection by men during their childbearing

and child rearing years. Men have no right to deny them of that right and no right to neglect their duties in this respect.

3. Children have a right to be protected and cared for by their mothers and to be

provided for by their fathers. They are the fruits of their fathers’ pleasure, and it is

ordained by God that father’s must labor to provide for their fruits lest the fruits be

dropped from the vine before they are ready for the harvest.

4. Women have the right of respect from their husbands and children. No where in the

Word of God is a man given the right to strike his wife, or to degrade or humiliate

her with false accusations. Five Proverbs, on the other hand, state that the rod is for

the backs of fools. Only a fool would not know that he is to respect and love his

wife (be concerned for her body as he is his own body), because she has been joined

to his body by an act of God.

5. Underage women have the right to be protected from licentious and exploitative men

who lust after their bodies and souls. May such men be made impotent by a

merciful God for the sake of their souls.

THE "ERA" OF CONFUSION IS "NOW"

Only a disgraceful, degraded, and depraved society would require women to labor as men and separate mothers from their children. Is it not enough that the fathers have abandoned their responsibility for the fruits of their pleasure that they must also demand taxes from mothers that they have used, abused, and accused for their own amusement?

What? Must women pay for their own sins and those of men as well?

See Genesis 4: 14-21. Eve was to be subject to Adam and bear children, but Adam was to bring forth food and provide the living in the "sweat of his face." In our society over half of all women suffer both punishments--bear the children and provide for them. Nobody protests this inequity, because women don’t know their true rights!

Genesis 4: 16, "Unto the woman He said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and conception; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." Most women have it in themselves to satisfy their husbands’ wishes and desires. Indeed, they seldom find peace any other way.

For that reason, a wife is willing to submit herself to a man and even pretend that she enjoys doing so--whether she is sick, in pain, or has a genuine headache--if he insists. Is it not enough that she must submit to him, but she must also pretend that she is pleased to do so or risk rejection or humiliation in many cases?

"And unto Adam He said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: Cursed is the ground for thy sake. In sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life. Thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to thee, and thou shalt eat the herbs of the field in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground. For out of it

was thou taken: for dust thou art and unto dust shalt thou return. (Nowadays, Eve pays for her sin and pays for Adam’s sin, too!)

Scientists who measure pain in dols have proved that few men suffer more than five dols of pain in a lifetime. But all women in childbirth--without exception and regardless of individual stoicism--suffer at least eleven dols or more than twice as much as any man ever experiences even from Aids or Tic douleureux or can even imagine.

You would think that this fact alone would be enough to gain a little respect, wouldn’t you?

Most women--to please their husbands as God has ordained that they must do--have become excellent bedroom actresses. They pretend to be pleased at times, when they may not feel like it, because to women "love" is pleasing her husband! Her joy is often more in receiving his approval, respect, and concern for her well being, than it is from the pleasure of the sex act itself.

Men cannot possibly understand that, and most women give up quite early in the game trying to make them understand. But if women do not get what they want from the relationship, they begin to find excuses for not giving men what they want. Out of fear of loss or rejection, many women go on for years living in quiet desperation pretending to enjoy one thing, but feeling deprived of the kind of "love" that they want in return.

To make matters worse, many sluts and harlots are waiting in the wings, who are more experienced at being bedroom actresses, less harried by the duties that wives and mothers perform, and are often willing to perform unspeakable acts for money. "Wo, Wo, Wo, Thou name art Wo-man." Women are forced to suffer all the woes of mankind and must smile and say, "It is my pleasure, Sir," or be abandoned, forsaken, and rejected by their own lovers and husbands, or so, many men make women feel at times.

Fortunate is the woman who is married to the man who is wise enough to pat her on the head and say, "I really appreciate all that you do for me." Just once may be enough to sustain her for years.

How do "working mothers" on television (fictional dramas) manage to look beautiful while they put food on the table without cooking it, live in spotlessly clean houses without cleaning them, and somehow get the laundry done without doing it. Is it some trick (or treachery) of the imagination that these plastic Barbie dolls can do so much while real wives and mothers stare in despair? Perhaps, it is all a fig leaf of some man’s imagination. Some woman should defoliate these male writers and expose what is behind it all--THEY LIE FOR MONEY OR LIVE OUT THEIR FANTASIES ON T V.

A man is turned on by what he sees, but a woman is turned on by what she sees--in a man’s eyes. Men think they do the chasing and choosing; but women do the choosing by rejecting those men who have lust in their eyes in favor of those whose eyes tell them "You are sacred to me."

If a woman becomes impatient and mistakes lust for the love light of concern she really wants, she is not necessarily a fool, but may reason, "Let us marry," believing she is making a fair deal. Men agree, expecting to pay the price for their lust--if they must.

A few women have been deceived and have betrayed the rest of us by insisting upon "equal rights." Against their basic instincts for survival, these women have legalized the liberation of men--men, who would sell their souls to satisfy their lust for the bodies of women--if they had to.

In times past, she gave him sex on request; he gave her a sense of security--no matter how humble--in return. She relaxed in his love and could give herself to him in complete abandon without fear of being abandoned. HE WAS HER LOVER AND LORD, and they both were content to keep their vows. It is still a good plan--really!

The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world, a sage said.

Baby-sitters rock and rule. Did we make that bed?

Why do women go alone to a strange man’s apartment (All men are a little "strange" in this respect!)? And then cry, "Rape"? Of course, women are free to go where they please, wear what they please, and tease whom they please, but do these women who send out "I’m available" signals, have the right to declare that they are suddenly "unavailable" in a burst of righteous indignation?

Men often react to such behavior with anger and sometimes a desire to get revenge, because they are firmly convinced that these women do not say, "No" to other men--only them. The male of the species has the kind of ego, which cannot tolerate that kind of "thoughtless and unkind abuse." Just between us girls, I must tell you that the laws of nature teach us that we cannot play with fire without getting burnt.

It may be fun to play these games, but is it fair? Why don’t you admit that the alleged "date rapes" are just as much the result of your desire to have power over men as it is the result of their desire to have power over women? Sure, it is exhilarating to turn on your "power" that makes him all weak and like jelly! But just because you can turn it on and off like a faucet, doesn’t mean you can turn him on and off like that! And they are bigger than you, physically! Do not tease the bull that is in every man you meet, or

you might get gored. Be kind to dumb animals--and that includes men, too!

Assembly line Barbie Dolls who run around in G-strings are just as heartless as anything made of plastic looks. Some one else said, "If a woman wants to be treated like a lady, she should act like one," and it is as true now as it was when Grandma said it.

If there were, it probably wouldn’t be Heaven.

Mothers for hire are no better qualified to care for another’s kids, than soldiers for hire are qualified to defend another’s country. They work for money--not love.

[Back to Top]

BACK TO HOME